From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37635 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxJcy-0008HZ-AJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:40:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PxJcv-00059o-MO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:40:35 -0500
Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:54438)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1PxJcv-00059E-5x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:40:33 -0500
Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so534775qyk.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 05:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4D77834B.4030002@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:40:27 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1299345255-577-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<1299345255-577-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<4D727BE7.1090001@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <4D727BE7.1090001@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] qemu_next_deadline should not consider
 host-time timers
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: edgar.iglesias@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 03/05/2011 07:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-03-05 18:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> It is purely for icount-based virtual timers.
>
> How about renaming the function to clarify its scope?

Will do.

Paolo