From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44712 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Py3jw-0001JT-HZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:54:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1Py3jv-00042m-6f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:54:52 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43464)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1Py3ju-00042d-S1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:54:51 -0500
Message-ID: <4D7A37A6.7010300@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:54:30 +0100
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1299854234-22003-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
	<4D7A3433.2060006@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4D7A3433.2060006@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] Make VNC support optional
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 03/11/11 15:39, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VNC
>>       /* init remote displays */
>>       if (vnc_display) {
>>           vnc_display_init(ds);
>> @@ -3088,6 +3095,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>>               printf("VNC server running on `%s'\n",
>> vnc_display_local_addr(ds));
>>           }
>>       }
>> +#endif
> 
> So what ends up being the default display if VNC and SDL are both
> disabled?  Have you tested this?

Then you cry :) actually you just don't get video output, a bit like if
you run with -nographic, except it doesn't try to force taking over
stdio. This is intentional btw :)

v3 will be in your mailbox shortly.

Jes