From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52159 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Py5Ek-00087d-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:30:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Py5Ej-00083j-0P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:30:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Py5Ei-00083X-OB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:30:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4D7A4E1E.4050304@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:30:22 +0100 From: Jes Sorensen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] Make VNC support optional References: <1299854234-22003-1-git-send-email-Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com> <4D7A3433.2060006@codemonkey.ws> <4D7A37A6.7010300@redhat.com> <4D7A37ED.7020505@codemonkey.ws> <4D7A44AB.4030006@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4D7A44AB.4030006@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 03/11/11 16:50, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 03/11/2011 09:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> (Also the "-nographic" running of serial over stdio doesn't let >> you kill qemu with ^C, the way "-serial stdio" does, which is >> just annoyingly inconsistent...) > > So if we want to have another mode that has different characteristics, > that's fine, but it should be selectable via the command line regardless > of how the build is configured. > > I don't like the idea of a magic mode that is unlocked when other > features are disabled because then there's no good way to test such a > feature in a full build. Ok I guess it is a question of whether you consider this a magic mode. It really is the same as -vnc with nothing connected to it. I can add a new mode it you like, or we can teach -nographic to behave sanely - I agree 100% with Peter on this one. Let me know what you want to have? Cheers, Jes