From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36725 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzORT-0005Zy-QY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:13:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>) id 1PzORS-0004Wy-G4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:13:19 -0400
Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:28623)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>) id 1PzORS-0004W9-2V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:13:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4D7F1187.8010502@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:13:11 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain>
	<4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com>
	<4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com>
	<4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> <20110315033820.GA16259@amt.cnet>
In-Reply-To: <20110315033820.GA16259@amt.cnet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On 2011-03-15 04:38, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:21:07PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>  The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
>>>>>  regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
>>>>
>>>> Can't follow. What do you mean?
>>>
>>> I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test 
>>> definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. 
>>>   What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.
>>
>> Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else?
>>
>> Jan
> 
> The failing Fedora installation problem is gone.

You lost it :), or was it solved?

Anyway, will now repost part V of upstream patches later today.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux