From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38085 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzUe5-0005YZ-N1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:50:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzUe4-0005Z2-GV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:50:45 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:55053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzUe4-0005Yq-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:50:44 -0400 Received: by gxk26 with SMTP id 26so294475gxk.4 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D7F6EB0.6060802@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:50:40 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mars 14th List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel On 03/14/2011 01:14 PM, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Please send any agenda items you are interested in covering. Switching from gPXE to iPXE. Fedora could lead the switch if it gets some commitment from QEMU to switch in 0.15 too (assuming the switch is successful). See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684792 The only downside I see is that iPXE doesn't have a stable release. Paolo