qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: jan.kiszka@siemens.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/7] Consolidate DisplaySurface allocation in qemu_alloc_display()
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:53:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D7F7D65.50202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D7F7C60.9050500@codemonkey.ws>

On 03/15/11 15:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> index f4e4741..dec9a76 100644
>> --- a/console.h
>> +++ b/console.h
>> @@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ void register_displaystate(DisplayState *ds);
>>   DisplayState *get_displaystate(void);
>>   DisplaySurface* qemu_create_displaysurface_from(int width, int
>> height, int bpp,
>>                                                   int linesize,
>> uint8_t *data);
>> +DisplaySurface* qemu_alloc_display(DisplaySurface *surface, int width,
>> +                                   int height, int linesize,
>> +                                   PixelFormat pf, int newflags);
> 
> Is it really useful at all to return DisplaySurface?  When I see a
> return value of 'DisplaySurface *' and an alloc in the function name, I
> assume this function allocates a display surface but it's really
> allocating the framebuffer within a display surface.

I am not sure what is better here - if you have a better suggestion for
the name, I am all open. The reason it turned out this way is that there
are already other ways where the DisplaySurface itself can be allocated.

Cheers,
Jes

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-15 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15 12:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce -display and make VNC optional Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] Consolidate DisplaySurface allocation in qemu_alloc_display() Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 14:49   ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2011-03-15 14:53     ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] Introduce -display argument Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 14:07   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2011-03-15 14:53     ` Anthony Liguori
2011-03-15 14:55       ` Jes Sorensen
2011-03-15 15:14     ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-15 14:51   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-03-15 14:54     ` Jes Sorensen
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] Introduce -display none Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] Add support for -display vnc Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] error message if user specifies SDL cmd line option when SDL is disabled Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] error message if user specifies curses on cmd line when curses " Jes.Sorensen
2011-03-15 12:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] Make VNC support optional Jes.Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D7F7D65.50202@redhat.com \
    --to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).