From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38975 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2T1L-0003Ur-EW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:43:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2T1K-0001s0-DK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:43:03 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:55387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2T1K-0001ro-An for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:43:02 -0400 Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so4236862yib.4 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D8A3F2A.30905@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:42:50 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 11/11] test-vmstate: add test case to verify we don't change VMState References: <1300839376-22520-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1300839376-22520-12-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4D89EABE.50204@codemonkey.ws> <4D8A0947.5080809@codemonkey.ws> <4D8A1F6F.8060003@codemonkey.ws> <4D8A21A4.3040404@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4D8A21A4.3040404@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Peter Maydell , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "quintela@redhat.com" On 03/23/2011 11:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > This is true for incompatible devices, but not for those that are > perfectly exchangeable (like in-kernel vs. user-space irqchip). I view this as the exception that proves the rule. We should handle cases like this as very special cases. I've found almost close to a dozen cases where we've got devices with conflicting names that aren't compatible and so far, none that truly are. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Jan >