From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59405 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4A2m-00019F-MA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:51:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4A2l-0003dd-9L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:51:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:51204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4A2k-0003dT-Vn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:51:31 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so613870pzk.4 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4D90682C.4040102@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:51:24 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1301023292-24977-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <1301023292-24977-28-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 27/27] Add SLOF-based partition firmware for pSeries machine, allowing more boot options List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: paulus@samba.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anton@samba.org, David Gibson On 03/28/2011 12:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> diff --git a/pc-bios/README b/pc-bios/README >> index 3fc0944..646a31a 100644 >> --- a/pc-bios/README >> +++ b/pc-bios/README >> @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ >> The included image for PowerPC (for 32 and 64 bit PPC CPUs), Sparc32 >> and Sparc64 are built from OpenBIOS SVN revision 1018. >> >> +- SLOF (Slimline Open Firmware) is a free IEEE 1275 Open Firmware >> + implementation for certain IBM POWER hardware. The sources are at >> + https://github.com/dgibson/SLOF, and the image currently in qemu is >> + built from git tag qemu-slof-20110323. >> + >> - The PXE roms come from Rom-o-Matic gPXE 0.9.9 with BANNER_TIMEOUT=0 > > Is this a line removal? No, it's a bug in your mailer. :) Glad to see Thunderbird isn't the only one that butcher replies to patches (in addition to patches of course). Paolo