From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59027 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4JJs-0004M7-FW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1Q4JJo-0002dW-8i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:45 -0400
Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:46563)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aliguori@us.ibm.com>) id 1Q4JJo-0002dQ-2D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:45:44 -0400
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com
	[9.17.195.106])
	by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p2SKcwYg001472
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:38:58 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168])
	by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	p2SKjMKE115508
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:45:29 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP
	id p2SKjLKS012237
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:45:22 -0600
Message-ID: <4D90F360.3090900@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:45:20 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 05/12] qapi: fix handling for
	null-return async callbacks
References: <1301082479-4058-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<1301082479-4058-6-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<4D8D0788.7070700@us.ibm.com> <20110328134747.5c9fbc8e@doriath>
	<4D90CC88.5070904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<4D90D31F.8020405@codemonkey.ws> <4D90F2B0.908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D90F2B0.908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, agl@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>

On 03/28/2011 03:42 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
>
> Is this supposed to be the current behavior? In early testing I 
> noticed that not including a tag, and issuing an async command that 
> never completed, still allowed for me to get responses for subsequent, 
> tagless/pseudo-tagged requests.

I don't think the server enforces tag-reuse today as that's really 
something a client should be checking for.  It certainly doesn't hurt 
for the server to complain if a client sends a tag that's already in use 
though.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori