From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43080 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7BEd-0008CS-GC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7BEc-0000l6-MG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7BEc-0000km-Ca for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:44:14 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p35IiCDx011848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:44:12 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p35IiCFV003393 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:44:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([10.3.113.3]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p35Ii9sI023088 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:44:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4D9B630D.9070706@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:44:29 -0300 From: Cleber Rosa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5] References: <20110405150703.GQ22884@x200.localdomain> <20110405160119.GF8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> <1302020868.2669.13.camel@freedom> <20110405170830.GG8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> <4D9B5A96.3010603@codemonkey.ws> <1302027954.2669.59.camel@freedom> In-Reply-To: <1302027954.2669.59.camel@freedom> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/05/2011 03:25 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote: >>>> The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination >>>> program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have >>>> all infrastructure in place there. If we need graphical clients being >>>> started and controlled on a linux bare metal machine, I am afraid we'll >>>> have to resort to those GUI test automation frameworks I mentioned. if >>>> our test is geared more towards windows clients, then they won't be >>>> needed, sure. >>> oh, but the added requirement is just launching the client >> It would be interesting to have autotest support getting screen grabs >> from a client vs. directly from qemu. > Would need to write 'drivers' to get screen shots from KVM (Keyboard, > video and Mouse) or RSA, on IBM boxes... never thought about that > before, no idea of how difficult it is. I guess Anthony meant grabbing screenshots from a VNC or SPICE client, right? >> That would allow you to run the step files through the client. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori >> >> > >