From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40881 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7Cvi-0006Uc-B4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7Cva-0003eP-02 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:42 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:56962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7CvZ-0003eL-RF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:41 -0400 Received: by yib19 with SMTP id 19so385451yib.4 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D9B7C63.4090307@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:32:35 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: spice in kvm-autotest [was: Re: KVM call minutes for Apr 5] References: <20110405150703.GQ22884@x200.localdomain> <20110405160119.GF8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> <1302020868.2669.13.camel@freedom> <20110405170830.GG8723@playa.tlv.redhat.com> <4D9B5A96.3010603@codemonkey.ws> <1302027954.2669.59.camel@freedom> <4D9B630D.9070706@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4D9B630D.9070706@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cleber Rosa Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/05/2011 01:44 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: > On 04/05/2011 03:25 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:08 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 04/05/2011 12:08 PM, Alon Levy wrote: >>>>> The thing about WHQL is that it has its own test suite coordination >>>>> program (DTM), that has to run on a separate machine/VM. So they have >>>>> all infrastructure in place there. If we need graphical clients being >>>>> started and controlled on a linux bare metal machine, I am afraid >>>>> we'll >>>>> have to resort to those GUI test automation frameworks I >>>>> mentioned. if >>>>> our test is geared more towards windows clients, then they won't be >>>>> needed, sure. >>>> oh, but the added requirement is just launching the client >>> It would be interesting to have autotest support getting screen grabs >>> from a client vs. directly from qemu. >> Would need to write 'drivers' to get screen shots from KVM (Keyboard, >> video and Mouse) or RSA, on IBM boxes... never thought about that >> before, no idea of how difficult it is. > > I guess Anthony meant grabbing screenshots from a VNC or SPICE client, > right? Yes. Regards, Anthony Liguori > >>> That would allow you to run the step files through the client. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Anthony Liguori >>> >>> >> >> > >