From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55091 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7UPx-0000h9-76 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:13:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7UPw-0000fV-3X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:13:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7UPv-0000fP-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:13:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4D9C8391.102@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:15:29 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] GSoC - QCOW2 <-> QED image converter References: <20110406150606.GA28955@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20110406150606.GA28955@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Lyu Mitnick , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 06.04.2011 17:06, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:41:37AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> Yes, split images are not supported by block/vpc.c. > > I'm working on that feature for vmdk right now, which is quite > interesting as vmdk really is two different format both claiming > to be vmdk, of which one is simply a text file telling how other > vmdk images are glued together. Last time I checked the other one wasn't a single format either, but rather something like ten different subformats. Anyway, if you're working on split VMDK images, I should probably stop advertising it as a GSoC project? Kevin