From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43672 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q9ITk-0002ii-F2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:52:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Q9ITh-0005MH-KO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:52:35 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50303)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Q9ITh-0005M8-9H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:52:33 -0400
Message-ID: <4DA3163E.7070600@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:54:54 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2db4951250c8473b5d0b78d24353c45c32b5aa8a.1302344671.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <2db4951250c8473b5d0b78d24353c45c32b5aa8a.1302344671.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] atapi: Drives can be locked without
	media present
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Am 09.04.2011 12:24, schrieb Amit Shah:
> Drivers are free to lock drives without any media present.  Such a
> condition should not result in an error condition.
> 
> See Table 341 in MMC-5 spec for details.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>

Thanks, applied both to the block branch.

Kevin