From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49898)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Q9sFF-0002mT-C7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:04:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Q9sFE-0002D4-DV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:04:01 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34325)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Q9sFE-0002D0-1d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:04:00 -0400
Message-ID: <4DA52EBB.8080702@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:03:55 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1302597850-10708-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<4DA41ACB.8090403@siemens.com> <4DA4530F.2070905@redhat.com>
	<20110412215014.GC8375@laped.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20110412215014.GC8375@laped.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 04/12/2011 11:50 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> I also tested the code and it works beautifully for my testcases!
> iothread & icount ran faster than icount without iothread.

That's very good news, thanks!

Paolo