From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58856)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Q9xCt-0003W4-KP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:22:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Q9xCo-0000kC-0W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:21:55 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47526)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Q9xCn-0000jc-Js
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:21:49 -0400
Message-ID: <4DA579CB.1010100@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:24:11 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1302624272.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1302624272.git.amit.shah@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/5] atapi: Implement 'media' subcommand
	for GESN
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Am 12.04.2011 18:06, schrieb Amit Shah:
> The GET_EVENT_STATUS_NOTIFICATION ATAPI command is listed as a
> mandatory command in the spec but we don't really implement it any of
> its sub-commands.
> 
> The commit message for the last commit explains why implementing just
> the media subcommand is helpful and how it goes a long way in getting
> guests to behave as expected.
> 
> The difference from the RFC series sent earlier is:
> - Split into more patches
> - Add tray open/close notification (from Markus)
> 
> There certainly is much more work to be done for the other commands
> and also for state change handling (tray open / close / new media)
> overall for the block layer, but this is a good first step in being
> spec-compliant and at the same time making guests work.

Thanks, applied all to the block branch.

Kevin