From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46925) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QANDz-0005aW-Fd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:08:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QANDy-0000G6-PA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:08:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QANDy-0000Fx-DH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:08:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4DA6FFE9.6010100@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:08:41 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DA47FEB.5070402@siemens.com> <4DA6FB44.3020208@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DA6FB44.3020208@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Slirp reverse UDP firewall List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Daisuke Nojiri , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/14/2011 04:48 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> Will we see a TCP firewall as well? Can we prepare for a more generic >> infrastructure, or what makes UDP special? > > > If some generic firewall like BPF is available as a user library, > perhaps we can integrate one instead of writing a new one from scratch. > Heck, you could even write a tcg backend for bpf instructions and run the jit the firewall filter set. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function