From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] set VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST unconditionally
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:17:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA87DBD.3030406@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302885415.16562.3358.camel@nimitz>
On 04/15/2011 11:36 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:21 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> This patch makes the "tell host first" logic the only case. This
>>> should make everybody happy, and reduce the amount of untested or
>>> untestable code in the kernel.
>> It doesn't make me happy.
> Darn.
>
>> Why would we do this in QEMU? This prevents the guest from doing
>> ballooning reclaim during OOM.
> What the heck is "ballooning reclaim"? Could you elaborate a bit on how
> this happens? I think I'm missing some subtlety here.
If you're in OOM and you need memory, you can't ask the host for more
and wait for a response. You have to reclaim it immediately.
See the s390 balloon driver for an example of this.
> I think 'tell host first' is the only sane way to do it. Look at the
> 'tell host second code':
>
> release_pages_by_pfn(); // let other kernel users at the pages
> tell_host(); // tell the hypervisor they're used again
> At the point we've started using the pages again, we haven't *told* the
> host that we're using them. I think that's potentially a problem. Is
> qemu somehow cool with the guest touching pages that are supposed to be
> in the balloon and unusable?
Yes, of course it is. All ballooning does is madvise(MADV_DONTNEED). A
guest can reclaim the memory as soon as it wants it to.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> -- Dave
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-15 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-15 14:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] set VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST unconditionally Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 16:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-15 16:36 ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 17:17 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-04-15 19:15 ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 19:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-18 15:37 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA87DBD.3030406@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).