From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42743) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QArOZ-0007hF-Sr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:21:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QArOY-0000jN-T9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:21:43 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:34134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QArOY-0000jF-Qk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:21:42 -0400 Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p3FLvNLR018471 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:57:23 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p3FMLaLm2539634 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:21:38 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p3FMLZ9V021066 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:21:35 -0300 Message-ID: <4DA8C4F0.4080507@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:21:36 -0700 From: Badari Pulavarty MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1302874855-14736-1-git-send-email-stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110415150513.GA29619@lst.de> <20110415153448.GA30116@lst.de> <1302884634.32391.3.camel@badari-desktop> <20110415172909.GB303@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20110415172909.GB303@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] raw-posix: Linearize direct I/O on Linux NFS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Kevin Wolf , Anthony Liguori , Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Khoa Huynh On 4/15/2011 10:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:23:54AM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > >> True. That brings up a different question - whether we are doing >> enough testing on mainline QEMU :( >> > It seems you're clearly not doing enough testing on any qemu. Even > the RHEL6 qemu has had preadv/pwritev since the first beta. > Christoph, When you say "you're" - you really meant RH right ? RH should have caught this in their regression year ago as part of their first beta. Correct ? Unfortunately, you are picking on person who spent time find & analyzing the regression, narrowing the problem area and suggesting approaches to address the issue :( BTW, I am not sure RH discussion is appropriate in this forum. Thanks, Badari