From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47442)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1QEeMM-0004dH-Uj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:15:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1QEeMI-0007Sl-Uk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:15:06 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12100)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1QEeMI-0007SQ-KC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:15:02 -0400
Message-ID: <4DB68CFD.2060501@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:14:37 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4D6BD085.8000001@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTik-9oDv2UyRzVQQtKNumJnVT9pp_0U_5z+A9PSv@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D6CE170.6060108@redhat.com>
	<AANLkTin8qCDOjFQZ_heMc9fYqDBa+ErjtyzXYcRuXhgU@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D6D01E2.1070908@redhat.com> <4D6E1B28.8090400@redhat.com>
	<20110302105859.GC18908@playa.tlv.redhat.com>
	<4D6E245A.5070800@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D6E245A.5070800@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality
 vs	supportive features
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: dlaor@redhat.com
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

   Hi,

>> I think that would work well for spice. Spice uses shared memory from the
>> pci device for both the framebuffer and surfaces/commands, but this is
>
> Is that the only DMA do you do? That's good for this model.

Yes.  Spice does both reads and writes though, so a way to tag pages as 
dirty is needed.

cheers,
   Gerd