From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34368)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1QEjMK-0005Mn-7L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:35:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1QEjMJ-0007db-6a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:35:24 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9476)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1QEjMI-0007dU-Dn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:35:23 -0400
Message-ID: <4DB6D7FC.6090608@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:34:36 +0200
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1303138953-1334-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<4DB03ADF.7060800@redhat.com> <4DB09A79.8010808@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<4DB66CC1.9050109@redhat.com> <4DB6D654.60000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB6D654.60000@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v2 00/11] QEMU Guest Agent: QMP-based
 host/guest communication (virtagent)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com, agl@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 04/26/11 16:27, Michael Roth wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 01:57 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Yeah it was the conclusion I came to on Thursday when I was working on
>> porting the freeze patches over. After fighting the json %#$%#$%#$ I
>> ended up with something I couldn't test in the end :(
> 
> I actually worked on getting most of the fsfreeze ported over yesterday,
> were they any major changes from the last set of patches other than the
> porting work? If so, feel free to send the patches my way and I'll hack
> on those a bit, otherwise I plan to have the fsfreeze stuff included in
> the next re-spin later this week.

I'll try and post them later today.

>> Any plans to add human monitor support in the near future?
> 
> The main target will be QMP for the initial patches. But ideally the HMP
> commands we add will have a pretty close correspondence with QMP.

That is unfortunate, QMP is really user unfriendly :(

Cheers,
Jes