From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] Add QMP bits for blockdev-snapshot-sync.
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:45:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB96173.9020405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB830D2.7010706@redhat.com>
On 04/27/11 17:05, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 04/27/11 17:05, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:27:01 +0200
>> Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> This is quivalent to snapshot_blkdev in the human monitor, with _sync
>>> added to the command name to make it explicit that the command is
>>> synchronous and leave space for a future async version.
>>
>> I'm not sure appending "_sync" is such a good convention, most commands
>> are sync today and they don't have it. I'd prefer to call it snapshot_blkdev
>> and note in the documentation how it works.
>>
>> On the other hand, I'm not sure how Anthony is going to model async
>> commands, so maybe he has a better suggestion.
>
> The _sync prefix is on purpose to leave space for a possible async
> implementation of the snapshot command in the future. This isn't related
> to it being a sync vs async qmp command though.
If people are more comfortable with the QMP command being
"blockdev-snapshot" and then using {-,_}async for the async comment in
the monitor and QMP later, that is fine with me.
I'd just like to move on this and get it upstream.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 14:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add QMP bits for blockdev-snapshot-sync Jes.Sorensen
2011-04-18 14:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] " Jes.Sorensen
2011-04-27 15:05 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-04-27 15:05 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 12:45 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2011-04-28 13:14 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 13:21 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 13:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-04-28 13:46 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 14:42 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-04-28 14:41 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 14:21 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-04-28 14:30 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 14:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-28 14:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-28 14:38 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 14:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-28 14:57 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-28 15:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-04-29 13:38 ` Jes Sorensen
2011-04-29 13:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-03 11:44 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB96173.9020405@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).