From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47393) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHZJu-0004lz-Ol for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:28:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHZJt-0006WM-U3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:28:38 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:23113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHZJt-0006W4-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 06:28:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4DC12A50.1000800@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 12:28:32 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4DC00BB1.7000008@siemens.com> <4DC031CC.1040902@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Import Linux headers for KVM and vhost List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Anthony Liguori , kvm , Marcelo Tosatti , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel , Avi Kivity On 2011-05-03 22:22, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 May 2011 17:48, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> +++ b/scripts/update-linux-headers.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ >> +#!/bin/sh > > No -e ? > >> +rm -rf $output/include/linux/* > > Given that updating the kernel headers will blow away large > subsets of include/ like this, maybe we should use a less generic > name than "include", so it's clear that it's just a set of > automatically maintained and updated files, rather than > a good place to put random QEMU header files? > > kernel-headers/ seems like an obvious choice. > > Is it worth having a README in the directory saying "don't > edit these, they are copies of the kernel headers, they can > be updated with ", or is that unnecessary? > No, these suggestion all make sense. I've incorporated them. Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux