From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHlGG-0001t4-Ew for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:13:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHlGF-0003BF-4T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:13:40 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:58984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHlGF-0003BB-27 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 19:13:39 -0400 Received: by ywl41 with SMTP id 41so688518ywl.4 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC1DD96.6030205@landley.net> Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 18:13:26 -0500 From: Rob Landley MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Are there any virtioconsole docs? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel I'm trying to replace --nographic sticking the console on the first serial port with a virtio-based console, and unfortunately the documentation seems nonexistent. qemu --help just says "--virtioconsole c", but that complains about an inability to run an ioctl on something. The qemu web docs say that --virtioconsole has been replaced by --device virtconsole but has no other mention of the word "virtconsole" anywhere else on the page: http://qemu.weilnetz.de/qemu-doc.html And trying it says: qemu-system-x86_64: -device virtconsole: No 'virtio-serial-bus' bus found for device 'virtconsole' Google brings up serveral fedora pages involving patches for specifying devices in some kind of XML: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00589.html And of course this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/VirtioSerial Which seems to document how to connect virtio to a file (pty? Socket?) on the host, rather than to the host's stdin/stdout or to the consoles in the SDL window. Am I mising something obvious? Is there a way to do this, or is the feature either designed for something other than I'm attempting or not finished yet? Rob