From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKrSI-0003Yh-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:26:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKrSI-00024S-0U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:26:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKrSH-00024M-OS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2011 08:26:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4DCD242C.8060300@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:29:32 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1304956314-7806-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1304956314-7806-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Specification for qcow2 version 3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 09.05.2011 17:51, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > Hi all, > > this is a first draft for what I think could be added when we increase qcow2's > version number to 3. This includes points that have been made by several people > over the past few months. We're probably not going to implement this next week, > but I think it's important to get discussions started early, so here it is. > > I hope the intentions of each change are clear, but feel free to ask if they > aren't. Also when I wasn't if/how exactly to specify things, I left a TODO in > some places. Silence means that you all agree with the proposal? Kevin