From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMEto-00028S-G7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 03:41:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMEtm-000205-S3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 03:41:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMEtm-0001zs-JB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 03:40:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD2272A.3060801@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:43:38 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1288876539-8300-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1288876539-8300-4-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <20110516111926.GA7928@elie> <4DD13EFF.80000@redhat.com> <20110516154301.GA25150@elie> <4DD149A2.6020801@redhat.com> <4DD15040.7030809@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DD15040.7030809@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [regression] qemu-system-arm: segfault in lsi_do_command List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 16.05.2011 18:26, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > On 05/16/2011 05:58 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Thanks. Still doesn't make much sense to me, the patch shouldn't change >> anything with respect to a malloc, but I can reproduce a segfault now. I >> think I'll have a closer look tomorrow. > > This fixes it on top of my SCSI refactoring series. Should I send v3 > with this one squashed in appropriately? Or should this be sent later? I think I would just include it in your series (and while you're at it, I think you could include Jonathan's cleanup as well). Kevin