From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33177) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMFm9-0008Dt-Qu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:37:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMFm8-0003UB-Qz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:37:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMFm8-0003U7-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 04:37:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD23454.7070705@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 10:39:48 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110516181023.7142.33402.sendpatchset@skannery> <20110516181037.7142.76146.sendpatchset@skannery> In-Reply-To: <20110516181037.7142.76146.sendpatchset@skannery> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Patch 1/3]Qemu: Enhance "info block" to display cache setting List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Supriya Kannery Cc: Christoph Hellwig , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Prerna Saxena Am 16.05.2011 20:10, schrieb Supriya Kannery: > Enhance "info block" to display cache setting > > Example: > (qemu) info block > ide0-hd0: type=hd removable=0 file=../rhel6-32.qcow2 ro=0 drv=qcow2 > encrypted=0 > > Enhanced to include "cache" setting: > (qemu) info block > ide0-hd0: type=hd removable=0 cache=none file=../rhel6-32.qcow2 ro=0 > drv=qcow2 encrypted=0 > > Signed-off-by: Supriya Kannery > Signed-off-by: Prerna Saxena > > --- > block.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Index: qemu/block.c > =================================================================== > --- qemu.orig/block.c > +++ qemu/block.c > @@ -1713,6 +1713,19 @@ static void bdrv_print_dict(QObject *obj > monitor_printf(mon, " locked=%d", qdict_get_bool(bs_dict, "locked")); > } > > + if (qdict_haskey(bs_dict, "open_flags")) { > + int open_flags = qdict_get_int(bs_dict, "open_flags"); > + if (open_flags & BDRV_O_NOCACHE) { > + monitor_printf(mon, " cache=none"); > + } else if (open_flags & BDRV_O_CACHE_WB) { > + if (open_flags & BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH) > + monitor_printf(mon, " cache=unsafe"); > + else > + monitor_printf(mon, " cache=writeback"); > + } else > + monitor_printf(mon, " cache=writethrough"); > + } > + > if (qdict_haskey(bs_dict, "inserted")) { > QDict *qdict = qobject_to_qdict(qdict_get(bs_dict, "inserted")); > > @@ -1762,9 +1775,10 @@ void bdrv_info(Monitor *mon, QObject **r > } > > bs_obj = qobject_from_jsonf("{ 'device': %s, 'type': %s, " > - "'removable': %i, 'locked': %i }", > + "'removable': %i, 'locked': %i, " > + "'open_flags': %d }", > bs->device_name, type, bs->removable, > - bs->locked); > + bs->locked, bs->open_flags); > > if (bs->drv) { > QObject *obj; bs->open_flags is a purely internal thing and its meaning is not guaranteed to be stable. Exposing it to the user is wrong. Kevin