From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52717) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMREo-00077a-CI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:51:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMREn-0008RN-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:51:30 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]:46800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMREm-0008Qb-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 16:51:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD2DFCD.6050608@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:51:25 -0600 From: David Ahern MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1305575782-31766-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1305575782-31766-19-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <4DD1E1DD.3060605@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/18] usb: add ehci adapter List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 05/17/11 14:39, Blue Swirl wrote: > The development history (implement a feature, fix bugs, implement > another, fix bugs etc) is not interesting and pulling it would make > bisection and other bugfixing more difficult. The patches should not > add known broken features and fix them next. > > Instead, patches should add one simple, bug free feature at a time. > This also makes it possible for some of them to be committed before > others, while others may get rejected and may need major rework. The > patches for EHCI are just like other patches. Jan's tree is bisectable. After the initial import of the EHCI code there was one mass diff which mainly went after cleanups and from there small, targeted patches. David