From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QO2iQ-0007j7-1S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:04:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QO2iP-0007Ot-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:04:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8340) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QO2iO-0007Op-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:04:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD8B584.3090600@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 10:04:36 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1305814352-15044-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <1305814352-15044-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Add declarations for hierarchical memory region API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2011 08:59 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > The memory API separates the attributes of a memory region (its size, how > > reads or writes are handled, dirty logging, and coalescing) from where it > > is mapped and whether it is enabled. This allows a device to configure > > a memory region once, then hand it off to its parent bus to map it according > > to the bus configuration. > > > > Hierarchical registration also allows a device to compose a region out of > > a number of sub-regions with different properties; for example some may be > > RAM while others may be MMIO. > > > > +/* Destroy a memory region. The memory becomes inaccessible. */ > > +void memory_region_destroy(MemoryRegion *mr); > > Doesn't the lower priority region become accessible instead in some cases? If we require that _add_subregion() and _del_subregion() be paired, then no. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.