From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39583)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1QO3FV-0003xo-Qe
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:38:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1QO3FU-00031Z-RD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:38:53 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27805)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1QO3FU-00031P-CF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 03:38:52 -0400
Message-ID: <4DD8BD86.4010106@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 10:38:46 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4DD3D236.90708@siemens.com>	<4DD3E1B3.3020405@siemens.com>	<4DD3E47F.9060104@redhat.com>	<4DD3E782.8090208@siemens.com>	<4DD3E8D6.6090807@redhat.com>	<20110519090851.GD28399@redhat.com>	<4DD4DE8E.8030402@redhat.com>	<20110519091404.GE28399@redhat.com>	<4DD5029D.6000700@redhat.com>	<20110519115405.GG28399@redhat.com>	<4DD505C4.6010604@redhat.com>	<4DD50B17.7000205@siemens.com>	<4DD511FB.3080901@redhat.com>	<4DD51413.1050202@siemens.com>	<4DD51468.7050509@redhat.com>	<4DD51531.7000701@siemens.com>	<4DD515F9.1020902@redhat.com>	<4DD51A82.7060205@siemens.com>	<4DD51B64.8000306@redhat.com>	<4DD51FDA.3010107@codemonkey.ws>	<4DD520ED.8010606@redhat.com>	<4DD5260A.1080309@codemonkey.ws>	<4DD5272F.5000003@siemens.com>	<4DD52848.6030102@codemonkey.ws>	<4DD52910.4080106@siemens.com>	<4DD52B0E.2080604@codemonkey.ws>
	<4DD52BF2.2080506@redhat.com>	<4DD54611.6090505@codemonkey.ws>
	<4DD62E01.5010600@redhat.com> <4DD689BA.8020106@codemonkey.ws>
	<4DD68FE5.1010506@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DD68FE5.1010506@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Memory API
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 05/20/2011 06:59 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >  Jan had mentioned previously about registering a new temporary window.
> >  I assume the registration always gets highest_priority++, or do you have
> >  to explicitly specify that PCI container gets priority=1?
>
> The latter.
>
> And I really prefer to have this explicit over deriving the priority
> from the registration order. That's way too fragile/unhandy. If you
> decide to replace a region of lower priority later on, you need to
> reregister everything at that level.

Exactly.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.