From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QO7S1-0003aw-Bv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:08:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QO7S0-0003lz-9F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:08:05 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:61642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QO7Rz-0003lf-Qy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 08:08:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD8FC9D.3090200@mail.berlios.de> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 14:07:57 +0200 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1304799357-19281-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <1304799357-19281-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/rbd: Remove unused local variable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: QEMU Developers , Christian Brunner Am 07.05.2011 22:15, schrieb Stefan Weil: > cppcheck report: > rbd.c:246: style: Variable 'snap' is assigned a value that is never used > > Remove snap and the related code. > > Cc: Christian Brunner > Cc: Kevin Wolf > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil > --- > block/rbd.c | 4 ---- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c > index 249a590..5c7d44e 100644 > --- a/block/rbd.c > +++ b/block/rbd.c > @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static int rbd_open(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *filename, int flags) > RbdHeader1 *header; > char pool[RBD_MAX_SEG_NAME_SIZE]; > char snap_buf[RBD_MAX_SEG_NAME_SIZE]; > - char *snap = NULL; > char *hbuf = NULL; > int r; > > @@ -533,9 +532,6 @@ static int rbd_open(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *filename, int flags) > s->name, sizeof(s->name))< 0) { > return -EINVAL; > } > - if (snap_buf[0] != '\0') { > - snap = snap_buf; > - } > > if ((r = rados_initialize(0, NULL))< 0) { > error_report("error initializing"); > What about this patch? Can it be applied to the block branch? Regards, Stefan W.