qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Add declarations for hierarchical memory region API
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 15:18:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD8FEFA.1020604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=i84nt0z0p9rFTv_O30rQaFiiZ7w@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/22/2011 03:06 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >  On 05/22/2011 12:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>
> >>  >>    >      +void memory_region_add_coalescing(MemoryRegion *mr,
> >>  >>    >      +                                  target_phys_addr_t offset,
> >>  >>    >      +                                  target_phys_addr_t size);
> >>  >>    >      +/* Disable MMIO coalescing for the region. */
> >>  >>    >      +void memory_region_clear_coalescing(MemoryRegion *mr);
> >>  >>
> >>  >>    Perhaps the interface could be more generic, like
> >>  >>    +void memory_region_set_property(MemoryRegion *mr, unsigned flags);
> >>  >>    +void memory_region_clear_property(MemoryRegion *mr, unsigned flags);
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>  >    Coalescing is a complex property, not just a boolean attribute.  We
> >>  >  probably
> >>  >    will have a number of boolean attributes later, though.
> >>
> >>  But what is the difference between adding coalescing to an area and
> >>  setting the bit property 'coalescing' to an area? At least what you
> >>  propose now is not so complex that it couldn't be handled as a single
> >>  bit.
> >
> >  Look at the API - add_coalescing() sets the coalescing property on a
> >  subrange of the memory region, not the entire region.
>
> Right, but doesn't the same apply to any other properties, they may
> apply to a full range or just a subrange?

We'll know when we have more properties.  I expect most will be region-wide.


> >
> >  Subregions are first-class regions.  In fact all regions are subregions
> >  except the root.
>
> Oh, I see now. Maybe the comments should describe this. Or perhaps the
> terms should be something like 'bus/bridge/root' and 'region' instead
> of 'region' and 'subregion'?

Problem is, memory_region_add_subregion() adds both sub-bridges and leaf 
regions.

It's quite possible that BAR 0 will be a leaf region, and BAR 1 will be 
a sub-bridge.

Can you suggest an alternative naming for the API?


> >  It's a tree of regions, each level adding an offset, clipping, and perhaps
> >  other attributes, with the leaves providing actual memory (mmio or RAM).
>
> I thought that there are two classes of regions, like PCI device vs. a
> single BAR.

It's true in a way, except the mapping is not 1:1.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-22 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-19 14:12 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Memory API Avi Kivity
2011-05-19 14:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Add declarations for hierarchical memory region API Avi Kivity
2011-05-19 19:07   ` Alex Williamson
2011-05-20  9:18     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-19 19:27   ` Jan Kiszka
2011-05-20  9:20     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-19 20:43   ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-20  9:23     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-20 14:06       ` Richard Henderson
2011-05-20 14:31         ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-20 14:40           ` Richard Henderson
2011-05-20 14:46             ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-20 18:16               ` Blue Swirl
2011-05-22  6:40                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22  6:39               ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22 15:46                 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-22 15:52                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22  6:38           ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22 15:44             ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-22 15:56               ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22  7:01         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-19 21:04   ` Stefan Weil
2011-05-20  9:26     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-19 21:11   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-05-20  9:28     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-20 17:59   ` Blue Swirl
2011-05-22  6:45     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22  9:32       ` Blue Swirl
2011-05-22 11:36         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22 12:06           ` Blue Swirl
2011-05-22 12:18             ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-05-22 15:32               ` Blue Swirl
2011-05-22 15:36                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-22  7:04     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD8FEFA.1020604@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).