From: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] piix_pci: optimize set irq path
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 14:24:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD9008D.7080204@mail.berlios.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <faf94d046e73447ab3d2a3077bcf60fe37b5682b.1301657711.git.yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Am 01.04.2011 13:43, schrieb Isaku Yamahata:
> optimize irq routing in piix_pic.c which has been a TODO.
> So far piix3 tracks each pirq level and checks whether a given pic pins is
> asserted by seeing if each pirq is mapped into the pic pin.
> This is independent on irq routing, but data path is on slow path.
>
> Given that irq routing is rarely changed and asserting pic pins is on
> data path, the path that asserts pic pins should be optimized and
> chainging irq routing should be on slow path.
> The new behavior with this patch series is to use bitmap which is
> addressed
> by pirq and pic pins with a given irq routing.
> When pirq is asserted, the bitmap is set and see if the pic pins is
> asserted by checking the bitmaps.
> When irq routing is changed, rebuild the bitmap and re-assert pic pins.
>
> test:
> - create VM with 4 e1000 nics in different pci slots
> (i.e. fn=0 for each e1000)
> Thus those e1000's INTA are connected to each PIRQ[A-D].
> - run linux as guest and saw each devices triggers interrupt
> by seeing /proc/interrupts. And then confirmed that each PIRQ[A-D]
> surely asserted interrupts.
> Because irq 10 and 11 are shared by 4 e1000's, it only one NIC is
> activated
> with ifconfig ethN up/down when counting interrupts.
>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
> ---
> Changes v4 -> v5:
> - fix piix_set_irq_pic()
>
> Changes v3 -> v4:
> - replace irq_num with pirq or pci_intx
>
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> - some minor clean ups
> - commit log message
> ---
> hw/piix_pci.c | 101
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/piix_pci.c b/hw/piix_pci.c
> index 35e420c..7ffb821 100644
> --- a/hw/piix_pci.c
> +++ b/hw/piix_pci.c
...
Hi,
I got a regression report which was obviously caused by this commit:
$ git bisect bad
ab431c283e7055bcd6fb622f212bb29e84a6a134 is the first bad commit
commit ab431c283e7055bcd6fb622f212bb29e84a6a134
Author: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Fri Apr 1 20:43:23 2011 +0900
My test scenario:
i386-softmmu/qemu -L pc-bios -cdrom tinycore_3.5.1.iso -m 256 -boot d
-net nic -net user -net dump
* Boot the default configuration (tinycore, or tinycore debug).
* Wait until X Windows is up.
* Check the size of qemu*.pcap. If it is only a few bytes, the test failed.
Emulated networking then does not work, Tinycore does not get an IP
address via DHCP.
The original report used tinycore_3.6.iso and the latest w32 binaries
from qemu.weilnetz.de
with the same result. It also says that other Linux distributions show
the same problem
(Fedora-14-i686-Live-Desktop.iso).
Regards
Stefan W.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-22 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 11:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/4] piix_pci: optimize irq data path Isaku Yamahata
2011-04-01 11:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/4] pci: add accessor function to get irq levels Isaku Yamahata
2011-04-01 11:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/4] piix_pci: eliminate PIIX3State::pci_irq_levels Isaku Yamahata
2011-04-01 11:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] piix_pci: optimize set irq path Isaku Yamahata
2011-05-22 12:24 ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2011-05-22 12:52 ` TeLeMan
2011-04-01 11:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/4] piix_pci: load path clean up Isaku Yamahata
2011-04-01 14:38 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] piix_pci: optimize irq data path Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DD9008D.7080204@mail.berlios.de \
--to=weil@mail.berlios.de \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yamahata@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).