From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55750)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1QOAiE-0007bT-Ea
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 11:37:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1QOAiD-0004vx-Er
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 11:37:02 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23542)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1QOAiD-0004vr-7R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 11:37:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4DD92D97.4020706@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 18:36:55 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1305814352-15044-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
	<1305814352-15044-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
	<BANLkTikAf+-NPnsQywsmh+8Xg7uT5-4g+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DD8B103.6080409@redhat.com>
	<BANLkTimkSbV3KPk8s0oi2hh0i_P2U0EP4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DD8F52B.1070905@redhat.com>
	<BANLkTi=i84nt0z0p9rFTv_O30rQaFiiZ7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DD8FEFA.1020604@redhat.com>
	<BANLkTi=bnB=XgU_jZcW5eLU5xsxO-YZMcg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=bnB=XgU_jZcW5eLU5xsxO-YZMcg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1] Add declarations for hierarchical memory
 region API
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On 05/22/2011 06:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >
> >  Can you suggest an alternative naming for the API?
>
> How about
> memory_region_container_init()
> memory_region_add()

I'm neutral.  If someone seconds this, I'll make it so.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.