From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] spapr: allow creating devices with -device
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 09:29:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDCAFD6.1060900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110524221222.GA11809@yookeroo.fritz.box>
On 05/25/2011 12:12 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>> @@ -602,6 +604,8 @@ static int spapr_vio_busdev_init(DeviceState *qdev, DeviceInfo *qinfo)
>> }
>>
>> dev->qdev.id = id;
>> + dev->vio_irq_num = bus->irq++;
>> + dev->qirq = xics_find_qirq(spapr->icp, dev->vio_irq_num);
>
> I'd prefer to see an spapr_allocate_irq() function, rather than open
> coding this multiple times.
I don't understand. This is the only call to xics_find_qirq, unlike
before this patch. It's not open coded multiple times.
I can surely add a spapr_allocate_irq() function that would keep the
code independent of the particular interrupt controller. Would you
prefer something that gives back the virtual IRQ number as well:
qemu_irq *spapr_allocate_irq(uint32_t *p_vio_irq_num)
or should I keep that in the VIOsPAPRBus, like this:
qemu_irq *spapr_allocate_irq(uint32_t p_vio_irq_num)
? Should I pass a sPAPREnvironment too, or should it just use the global?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 11:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] spapr qdevification Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-24 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] spapr: allow creating devices with -device Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-24 13:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-05-24 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-24 13:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-05-24 22:12 ` David Gibson
2011-05-25 7:29 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-05-30 3:16 ` David Gibson
2011-05-24 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] spapr: prepare for qdevification of irq Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-24 11:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] spapr: make irq customizable via qdev Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-24 22:14 ` David Gibson
2011-05-25 7:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-30 3:16 ` David Gibson
2011-05-25 15:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-05-30 3:17 ` David Gibson
2011-05-24 13:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] spapr qdevification Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DDCAFD6.1060900@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).