From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53530)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1QQxCQ-0007GU-B9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:47:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1QQxCO-0006zn-Sy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:47:42 -0400
Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:50092)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1QQxCO-0006z1-Mt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 03:47:40 -0400
Message-ID: <4DE34B99.2000505@web.de>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:47:37 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BANLkTimzTSU7A-b9yc9H35b1szfL4z7H-A@mail.gmail.com>	<4DE120BE.1010602@web.de>	<C4F7CD9A92DBFF48AD8779355CD4D7891222DD@exchsg04.s3graphics.com>
	<BANLkTi=A_6-3fRcd+LYcznZuNKmKHEVB-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=A_6-3fRcd+LYcznZuNKmKHEVB-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enig7CCA4CE79F74053860AF449B"
Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH uq/master V2] kvm: Add CPUID support for
	VIA CPU
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: BrillyWu <brillywu@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, KaryJin@viatech.com.cn, mst@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, BrillyWu@viatech.com.cn, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig7CCA4CE79F74053860AF449B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2011-05-30 09:40, BrillyWu wrote:
> From: BrillyWu <brillywu@viatech.com.cn>
>=20
> Hi, Jan
>          I'm very sorry for these bugs in the patch. Now I have made a
> new patch based on the
> newest uq/master where the patch has been applied to fix these bugs,
> is it feasible? If it is
> not acceptable, should I re-generate a patch based on previous
> uq/master, or what else?

A clean patch (which passed checkpatch...) against uq/master without the
broken version is required. We can't push a non-bisectable series upstrea=
m.

Jan


--------------enig7CCA4CE79F74053860AF449B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3jS5kACgkQitSsb3rl5xTkWACeNjs44IefAMxLaiQFk4JhZui4
HxMAn02RMAD4hn3a75BF5ft2Qv6S4zEV
=JNdW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig7CCA4CE79F74053860AF449B--