From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QMP: RFC: I/O error info & query-stop-reason
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:02:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE797F6.2060004@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110602132405.GJ514380@orkuz.home>
On 06/02/2011 08:24 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:08:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 06/02/2011 04:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>>> B. query-stop-reason
>>>>> --------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> I also have a simple solution for item 2. The vm_stop() accepts a reason
>>>>> argument, so we could store it somewhere and return it as a string, like:
>>>>>
>>>>> -> { "execute": "query-stop-reason" }
>>>>> <- { "return": { "reason": "user" } }
>>>>>
>>>>> Valid reasons could be: "user", "debug", "shutdown", "diskfull" (hey,
>>>>> this should be "ioerror", no?), "watchdog", "panic", "savevm", "loadvm",
>>>>> "migrate".
>>>>>
>>>>> Also note that we have a STOP event. It should be extended with the
>>>>> stop reason too, for completeness.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can we just extend query-block?
>>>
>>> Primarily we want 'query-stop-reason' to tell us what caused the VM
>>> CPUs to stop. If that reason was 'ioerror', then 'query-block' could
>>> be used to find out which particular block device(s) caused the IO
>>> error to occurr& get the "reason" that was in the BLOCK_IO_ERROR
>>> event.
>>
>> My concern is that we're over abstracting here. We're not going to add
>> additional stop reasons in the future.
>>
>> Maybe just add an 'io-error': True to query-state.
>
> Sure, adding a new field to query-state response would work as well. And it
> seems like a good idea to me since one already needs to call query-status to
> check if CPUs are stopped or not so it makes sense to incorporate the
> additional information there as well. And if you want to be safe for the
> future, the new field doesn't have to be boolean 'io-error' but it can be the
> string 'reason' which Luiz suggested above.
String enumerations are a Bad Thing. It's impossible to figure out what
strings are valid and it lacks type safety.
Adding more booleans provides better type safety, and when we move to
QAPI with a queryable schema, provides a way to figure out exactly what
combinations are supported by QEMU.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Jirka
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 21:12 [Qemu-devel] QMP: RFC: I/O error info & query-stop-reason Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-01 21:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 9:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-02 13:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 13:24 ` Jiri Denemark
2011-06-02 14:02 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-06-02 18:01 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 18:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 18:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 19:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-03 12:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 12:57 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-03 13:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 13:39 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-03 13:44 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 14:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 13:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-03 13:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 13:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-03 14:03 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-06 11:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-02 17:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 18:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 18:09 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 18:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 19:13 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 20:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2011-06-02 20:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2011-06-06 11:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 13:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 13:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 15:27 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-06 15:30 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-08 12:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 14:46 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 15:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 15:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 16:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 17:43 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 18:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 18:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 15:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-07 16:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 11:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 11:28 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE797F6.2060004@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).