From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"libvir-list@redhat.com" <libvir-list@redhat.com>,
jdenemar@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] QMP: RFC: I/O error info & query-stop-reason
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:55:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE7F8D0.5000302@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DE7EED6.2090609@redhat.com>
On 06/02/2011 03:13 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 02:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>>>>>> { "event": "BLOCK_IO_ERROR",
>>>>>>>>> "data": { "device": "ide0-hd1",
>>>>>>>>> "operation": "write",
>>>>>>>>> "action": "stop",
>>>>>>>>> "reason": "enospc", }
>>>>>>>>
>
>>>>>>> I'm ok with either way. But in case you meant the second one, I guess
>>>>>>> we should make "reason" a dictionary so that we can group related
>>>>>>> information when we extend the field, for example:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "reason": { "no space": false, "no permission": true }
>
> The idea for an event with details certainly has merit.
In an ideal would, would would just embed the BlockDeviceInfo structure
in the event and call it a day. In a less than ideal world, I think
it's better to make a call to query-block after having received the
BLOCK_IO_ERROR event.
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would we ever have "no permission"?
>
> SELinux denial, perhaps?
Maybe, but that would take a considerable amount of magic to make happen
in practice. Really only sounds plausible as an sVirt bug. I think you
could only make this happen if you you doing dynamic labelling.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>>
>>> Maybe libvirt guys could provide more input wrt the error reason usage.
>>> If we don't have valid use cases for other errors, then I'll agree that
>>> providing only "no space" is enough.
>>
>> Definitely! Adding libvirt to the CC to help encourage their input.
>
> We could always start with just one reason "no space", and add more
> later if and when we come up for use cases.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-02 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-01 21:12 [Qemu-devel] QMP: RFC: I/O error info & query-stop-reason Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-01 21:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 9:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-02 13:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 13:24 ` Jiri Denemark
2011-06-02 14:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 18:01 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 18:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 18:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 19:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-03 12:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 12:57 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-03 13:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 13:39 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-03 13:44 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-03 14:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 13:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-03 13:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-03 13:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-03 14:03 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-06 11:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-02 17:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 18:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 18:09 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 18:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 19:13 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-02 20:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-02 20:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2011-06-02 20:55 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-06-06 9:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2011-06-06 11:27 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 13:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 13:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 15:27 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-06-06 15:30 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-08 12:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 14:46 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 15:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 15:54 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 16:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 17:43 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 18:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-07 18:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-06-07 15:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-07 16:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 11:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-06-06 11:28 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE7F8D0.5000302@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).