From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] introduce cpu_physical_memory_map_fast
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:56:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DECCE94.1000904@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DECC7A6.7030506@redhat.com>
On 06/06/2011 07:27 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 11:16 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 05/12/2011 04:51 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2011 06:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> Paravirtualized devices (and also some real devices) can assume they
>>>> are going to access RAM. For this reason, provide a fast-path
>>>> function with the following properties:
>>>>
>>>> 1) it will never allocate a bounce buffer
>>>>
>>>> 2) it can be used for read-modify-write operations
>>>>
>>>> 3) unlike qemu_get_ram_ptr, it is safe because it recognizes "short"
>>>> blocks
>>>>
>>>> Patches 3 and 4 use this function for virtio devices and the milkymist
>>>> GPU. The latter is only compile-tested.
>>>>
>>>> Another function checks if it is possible to split a contiguous
>>>> physical
>>>> address range into multiple subranges, all of which use the fast path.
>>>> I will introduce later a use for this function.
>>>>
>>>> Paolo Bonzini (4):
>>>> exec: extract cpu_physical_memory_map_internal
>>>> exec: introduce cpu_physical_memory_map_fast and
>>>> cpu_physical_memory_map_check
>>>> virtio: use cpu_physical_memory_map_fast
>>>> milkymist: use cpu_physical_memory_map_fast
>>>>
>>>> cpu-common.h | 4 ++
>>>> exec.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>> hw/milkymist-tmu2.c | 39 ++++++++++--------
>>>> hw/vhost.c | 10 ++--
>>>> hw/virtio.c | 2 +-
>>>> 5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> Ping^2?
>
> Ping^3?
Oh, the patch series basically died for me when I saw:
Avi> What performance benefit does this bring?
Paolo> Zero
Especially given Avi's efforts to introduce a new RAM API, I don't want
yet another special case to handle.
You're just trying to avoid having to handle map failures, right? So
it's not really cpu_physical_memory_map_fast, it's really
cpu_physical_memory_map_simple?
I'd prefer that a device just treat failures as fatal vs. using a new API.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Paolo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 16:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] introduce cpu_physical_memory_map_fast Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-03 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] exec: extract cpu_physical_memory_map_internal Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-03 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] exec: introduce cpu_physical_memory_map_fast and cpu_physical_memory_map_check Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-03 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] virtio: use cpu_physical_memory_map_fast Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-03 16:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] milkymist: " Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-04 21:56 ` Michael Walle
2011-05-12 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] introduce cpu_physical_memory_map_fast Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-31 9:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-06-06 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-06-06 12:56 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-06-06 13:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-06-06 15:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-06 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-05-12 15:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-13 6:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DECCE94.1000904@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).