From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUIZw-0007Qz-Mf for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:13:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUIZt-0002IN-Te for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:13:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUIZt-0002I3-Bv for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:13:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4DEF7633.8050003@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:16:35 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] vmdk fails qemu-iotest 019 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Feiran Zheng Cc: Qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Fam, now that I had a VMDK patch in the queue for the first time since quite a while, I ran qemu-iotests for VMDK and I noticed that test case 019 fails. It doesn't seem to be a regression, even 0.14 and 0.13 fail it. I think you're running qemu-iotests to check your VMDK patches, so I wonder if you have already looked into this? Kevin