From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUgCC-0001bI-G3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:26:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUgCA-00078j-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:26:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUgCA-00078T-4g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:26:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4DF0D824.5020502@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:26:44 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1307625358-20040-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1307625358-20040-2-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <4DF0CA42.1080503@redhat.com> <4DF0D392.30203@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4DF0D392.30203@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] ide: Split error status from status register List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: stefanha@gmail.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com On 06/09/2011 04:07 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > I think you're right. We could enable it unconditionally (and change the > bm->status line from = to |=), but anyway it's redundant if the > subsections are present, so it wouldn't make a difference. Yes, I was thinking the same. Paolo