From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUiIH-0001VG-UN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:41:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUiIG-0005dg-Dp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:41:17 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:40072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUiIG-0005dN-0Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:41:16 -0400 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p59GHGuI004468 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:17:16 -0400 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p59GfDlO105392 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:41:14 -0400 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p59GkJ6C025556 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:46:20 -0600 Message-ID: <4DF0F79F.7050405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:41:03 -0500 From: Michael Roth MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1307140399-9023-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1307140399-9023-11-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2][ 10/21] qapi: add QMP input visiter List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, agl@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com On 06/09/2011 11:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 June 2011 23:33, Michael Roth wrote: >> A type of Visiter class > > [randomly noted against this patch because this is where I happened > to notice it...] > > Should be "Visitor" throughout (and in other patches), please? > > -- PMM Stefan pointed that out too...I was hoping to bring "visiter" back in style, but we can change it :)