Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Add support for fd: protocol

[Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>]

On 06/20/2011 12:35 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 04:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 06/20/2011 08:40 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2011 04:31 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
>>>> - Starting Qemu with a backing file
>>>>
>>>
>>> For this we could tell qemu that a file named "xyz" is available via fd
>>> n, via an extension of the getfd command.
>>>
>>> For example
>>>
>>> (qemu) getfd path="/images/my-image.img"
>>> (qemu) getfd path="/images/template.img"
>>> (qemu) drive-add path="/images/my-image.img"
>>>
>>> The open() for my-image.img first looks up the name in the getfd
>>> database, and finds it, so it returns the fd from there instead of
>>> opening. It then opens the backing file ("template.img") and looks it up
>>> again, and finds the second fd from the session.
>>
>> The way I've been thinking about this is:
>>
>> -blockdev id=hd0-back,file=fd:4,format=raw \
>> -blockdev file=fd:3,format=qcow2,backing=hd0-back
>>
>> While your proposal is clever, it makes me a little nervous about
>> subtle security ramifications.
>
> It would need careful explanation in the management tool author's guide,
> yes.
>
> The main advantage is generality. It doesn't assume that a file format
> has just one backing file, and doesn't require new syntax wherever a
> file is referred to indirectly.

FWIW, with blockdev, we need options to control this all anyway.  If you 
go back to my QCFG proposal, the parameters would actually be format 
specific, so if we had:

-block 
file=fd:4,format=fancypantsformat,part0=hd0-back.part1,part1=hd0-back.part2...

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>