From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYvNA-0000AO-HT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:27:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYvN8-0007fA-Gf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:27:43 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:45719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYvN8-0007ew-0U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:27:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4E0047EC.5090700@web.de> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:27:40 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9e6a385a5db82c11b78f87b207fa70136f0c2855.1308637593.git.jan.kiszka@web.de> <56EF9EC1-2FA8-4579-BFDF-8E7C2895185E@suse.de> <4E0046F7.9010805@web.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9286DFC8C9C35C7D4FBB43CC" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen: Clean up build system List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Anthony PERARD , xen-devel , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefano Stabellini This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9286DFC8C9C35C7D4FBB43CC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-06-21 09:26, Alexander Graf wrote: >=20 > On 21.06.2011, at 09:23, Jan Kiszka wrote: >=20 >> On 2011-06-21 09:21, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> On 21.06.2011, at 08:26, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> >>>> From: Jan Kiszka >>>> >>>> Introduce CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND so that this new config solely controls= the >>>> target-independent backend build and CONFIG_XEN can focus on per-tar= get >>>> building. >>> >>> What's the incentive here? I very much doubt we'll ever want to suppo= rt xen on !x86. In fact, the better solution would probably be to just mo= ve every build component to x86 specific code. >> >> I doubt that as well. But keeping the backend centrals prevent buildin= g >> them twice (for i386 and x86_64). >=20 > How can we not build them twice without risking that target_ulong break= s somewhere along the way? Because the backends don't depend on that. And we already build them only once, your your logs. :) Jan --------------enig9286DFC8C9C35C7D4FBB43CC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4AR+wACgkQitSsb3rl5xTFqgCgiN1KgnoDPy4FW4oVyQ4f3H0/ TSIAniBr774xpyETRRjucNCWzmUBqRXs =Aa9D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9286DFC8C9C35C7D4FBB43CC--