From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36156) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaM1S-00035a-Kp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:07:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaM1R-0004KC-HZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:07:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QaM1R-0004K8-A6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:07:13 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5P67Cjj026470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:07:12 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-5-3.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.3]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5P66vfV032348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:06:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4E057B53.9080700@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 08:08:19 +0200 From: Hans de Goede MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1308943978-6152-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1308943978-6152-9-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <201106251015.42820.bradh@frogmouth.net> In-Reply-To: <201106251015.42820.bradh@frogmouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/11] usb-ehci: Fix handling of PED and PEDC port status bits List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, On 06/25/2011 02:15 AM, Brad Hards wrote: > 5/11 does this: > -#define PORTSC_RO_MASK 0x007021c5 > +#define PORTSC_RO_MASK 0x007021c4 > > before 8/11 does this: >> -#define PORTSC_RO_MASK 0x007021c4 >> +#define PORTSC_RO_MASK 0x007021c0 > > You could push those together if there was a v2. I don't think its important > though. > I would rather keep them separate, they happen to touch the same define, but for completely different reasons. Regards, Hans