From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39049)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen.de>) id 1QatSg-0000aA-Vz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:49:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen.de>) id 1QatSf-0006Y9-JI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:49:34 -0400
Received: from mta-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.7.73]:50649)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen.de>) id 1QatSf-0006Y1-7c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:49:33 -0400
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40])
	by mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de
	(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008))
	with ESMTP id <0LNE00HFDS6H4EA0@mta-2.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:49:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] ([unknown] [84.44.132.141])
	by relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de
	(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9
	2008))
	with ESMTPA id <0LNE00AGLS6E5J00@relay-auth-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:49:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <4E077126.1030107@rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:49:26 +0200
From: "felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen" <felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen.de>
References: <4E054935.4060406@rwth-aachen.de>
	<BANLkTi=76cDNP6HR09osthYx3sCTo0qbxw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E060C98.30706@rwth-aachen.de>
	<BANLkTikSK+yVEeYwHdMsitJK9CGLzfn0wA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E06613D.8020603@rwth-aachen.de>
	<BANLkTikd=nmz1YUDhCtpRBw5czceV4=i9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <BANLkTikd=nmz1YUDhCtpRBw5czceV4=i9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU timing requirements
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 06/26/2011 06:49 AM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 05:29, felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen
> <felix.matenaar@rwth-aachen.de>  wrote:
>> Think I found the problem. It was a bug in my code and because of some weird
>> circumstances, backtrace and addresses seemed to be a segfault in a BBL.
> glad you find it..... care to share to everyone what's really goin'
> on? who knows it will reveal somekind of hidden problem in
> Qemu/TCG....
>
Yes I care. But the bug was not in Qemu. It was an integer underflow 
caused by a race condition. The behavior of the bug just seemed to be a 
problem with Qemu timers but it is not. So I thought it doesn't make 
much sense to share a bug in my code with the list...