From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QawTl-0000Kf-8H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:02:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QawTi-0006r3-Dp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:02:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:51121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QawTh-0006q0-PM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:02:50 -0400 Received: by pzk9 with SMTP id 9so3503443pzk.33 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <4E079E74.1050703@twiddle.net> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:02:44 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/12] TCG/HPPA: use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_SP List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel On 06/26/2011 12:20 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_SP for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl Acked-by: Richard Henderson r~