From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbFpW-0008Sk-Ad for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:42:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbFpU-0004ZZ-TM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:42:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:36151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbFpU-0004ZO-IC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:42:36 -0400 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4356300wwf.10 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <4E08C106.2020709@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:42:30 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/12] TCG/IA64: use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R12 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel , Aurelien Jarno On 06/26/2011 12:22 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R12 for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r~