From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:23:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0B1943.4090400@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0B1787.30709@redhat.com>
On 06/29/2011 07:16 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.06.2011 14:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> On 06/29/2011 06:59 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think we have touched this topic before during some IRC discussions or
>>> somewhere deep in a mailing list thread, but I think it hasn't been
>>> discussed on the list.
>>>
>>> Our default cache mode of cache=writethrough is extremely conservative
>>> and provides absolute safety at the cost of performance,
>>
>> But for the most part, we track bare metal fairly well in terms of block
>> performance, no?
>>
>> Or are you really referring to qcow2 as a specific example? In the
>> past, we used a different default caching mode for qcow2. I think that
>> could be done again if there was a compelling reason.
>
> No, people are also complaining about bad performance with raw. Which
> isn't really surprising when you do a flush after each single write
> request. O_SYNC is really much more than is needed in the average case.
Which file system on the host?
At any rate, I'm a big fan of making wce tunable in the guest and then I
think setting wce=1 is quite reasonable to do by default.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-29 11:59 [Qemu-devel] Default cache mode Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 12:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 12:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 12:23 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-06-29 12:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:17 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-06-29 14:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 15:07 ` Michael Tokarev
2011-06-29 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 16:03 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-29 13:53 ` Frediano Ziglio
2011-06-29 14:11 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-06-29 13:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 12:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 15:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 12:21 ` Alexander Graf
2011-06-29 13:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-29 14:05 ` Alexander Graf
2011-06-29 12:52 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-06-29 13:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 13:00 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-06-29 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:11 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0B1943.4090400@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=Qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).