qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/raw-posix: Linux compat-ioctl warning workaround
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:57:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0B2F67.5070702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629133601.GA8067@sig21.net>

Am 29.06.2011 15:36, schrieb Johannes Stezenbach:
> On Linux x86_64 host with 32bit userspace, running
> qemu or even just "qemu-img create -f qcow2 some.img 1G"
> causes a kernel warning:
> 
> ioctl32(qemu-img:5296): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(00005326){t:'S';sz:0} arg(7fffffff) on some.img
> ioctl32(qemu-img:5296): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(801c0204){t:02;sz:28} arg(fff77350) on some.img
> 
> ioctl 00005326 is CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS,
> ioctl 801c0204 is FDGETPRM.
> 
> The warning appears because the Linux compat-ioctl handler for these
> ioctls only applies to block devices, while qemu also uses the ioctls on
> plain files.  Work around by calling fstat() the ensure the ioctls are
> only used on block devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
> ---
> discussed in http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110617090424.GA19345@sig21.net
> 
> I'll also send a Linux kernel patch but this is needed to
> fix the warning on old kernels.

I probably wouldn't have bothered to work around it for older kernels,
but anyway it shouldn't hurt to do so.

Generally the patch looks good to me, just some minor comments:

> diff --git a/block/raw-posix.c b/block/raw-posix.c
> index 4cd7d7a..10d56f0 100644
> --- a/block/raw-posix.c
> +++ b/block/raw-posix.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
>  #include <sys/dkio.h>
>  #endif
>  #ifdef __linux__
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
>  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>  #include <sys/param.h>
>  #include <linux/cdrom.h>
> @@ -1188,6 +1190,7 @@ static int floppy_probe_device(const char *filename)
>      int fd, ret;
>      int prio = 0;
>      struct floppy_struct fdparam;
> +    struct stat st;
>  
>      if (strstart(filename, "/dev/fd", NULL))
>          prio = 50;
> @@ -1196,12 +1199,20 @@ static int floppy_probe_device(const char *filename)
>      if (fd < 0) {
>          goto out;
>      }
> +    ret = fstat(fd, &st);
> +    if (ret == -1) {
> +        goto outc;
> +    }
> +    if (!S_ISBLK(st.st_mode)) {
> +        goto outc;
> +    }

Why not a single if (ret == -1 || !S_ISBLK(st.st_mode))?

>      /* Attempt to detect via a floppy specific ioctl */
>      ret = ioctl(fd, FDGETPRM, &fdparam);
>      if (ret >= 0)
>          prio = 100;
>  
> +outc:
>      close(fd);
>  out:
>      return prio;
> @@ -1290,17 +1301,26 @@ static int cdrom_probe_device(const char *filename)
>  {
>      int fd, ret;
>      int prio = 0;
> +    struct stat st;
>  
>      fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK);
>      if (fd < 0) {
>          goto out;
>      }
> +    ret = fstat(fd, &st);
> +    if (ret == -1) {
> +        goto outc;
> +    }
> +    if (!S_ISBLK(st.st_mode)) {
> +        goto outc;
> +    }

Same here.

>      /* Attempt to detect via a CDROM specific ioctl */
>      ret = ioctl(fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT);
>      if (ret >= 0)
>          prio = 100;
>  
> +outc:
>      close(fd);
>  out:
>      return prio;
> @@ -1309,11 +1329,15 @@ out:
>  static int cdrom_is_inserted(BlockDriverState *bs)
>  {
>      BDRVRawState *s = bs->opaque;
> +    struct stat st;
>      int ret;
>  
> -    ret = ioctl(s->fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT);
> -    if (ret == CDS_DISC_OK)
> -        return 1;
> +    ret = fstat(s->fd, &st);
> +    if (!ret && S_ISBLK(st.st_mode)) {
> +        ret = ioctl(s->fd, CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS, CDSL_CURRENT);
> +        if (ret == CDS_DISC_OK)
> +            return 1;
> +    }
>      return 0;
>  }

I think this last hunk is unnecessary. cdrom_is_inserted should only be
called if cdrom_probe_device returned success before, so we have already
tested this.

Kevin

      reply	other threads:[~2011-06-29 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-29 13:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/raw-posix: Linux compat-ioctl warning workaround Johannes Stezenbach
2011-06-29 13:57 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E0B2F67.5070702@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=js@sig21.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).