From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGcn-0000Cw-1V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:45:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGck-0007qh-2i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:45:40 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43391 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcGcj-0007qE-KZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:45:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4E0C6FED.7080508@suse.de> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:45:33 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1308927034-10209-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1308927034-10209-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <4E0C6263.20908@suse.de> <4E0C7047.3010909@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E0C7047.3010909@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] xen_disk: treat "aio" as "raw" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com On 06/30/2011 02:47 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 30.06.2011 13:47, schrieb Alexander Graf: >> On 06/24/2011 04:50 PM, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com wrote: >>> From: Stefano Stabellini >>> >>> Sometimes the toolstack uses "aio" without an additional format >>> identifier, in such cases use "raw". >> Shouldn't this rather be a patch to the toolstack then? We do automatic >> file format recognition as default. I find magical "aio equals raw" >> subtleties rather unintuitive. > The asynchronous raw blktap driver is (was?) called "aio", so I guess > it's to stay compatible with that. Has always been this way in Xen (and > has always been confusing). As long as it stays in xen_disk.c, I don't > really mind... Is there a realistic chance of changing the toolstack here? I'd really prefer not to drag this legacy around :). Alex